Taig mill at 250 IPM!


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 59

Thread: Taig mill at 250 IPM!

  1. #1
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Taig mill at 250 IPM!

    As you guys probably know I keep preaching the mantra that bigger stepper motors do not always equal better stepper motors. I use and recommend 166 oz-in motors for Taigs and some folks always insist that you have to use 270 to 387 oz-in motors or a Taig just won't work properly.

    I was doing some feed-rate testing tonight and though I would see how fast I could get my Taig going. I am using the 166 oz-in motors I sell, with a G540 and a MeanWell 48V power supply, and a SmoothStepper. Generally I have the motors tuned to a max velocity of 40 IPM as nothing I do requires any faster rapids than that.

    I first tried 100 IPM and the mill worked fine. I upped the X axis to 150 IPM, then 200 IPM, then 250 IPM, finally at 300 IPM it quit! 250 IPM is kind of scary as there is a lot of vibration from the lead screw.

    The moral of the story is that choosing components that are well matched will always work better than just slapping on the largest motor you can. I made a short crappy video with my cell phone, I'll shoot a better one at a later date: http://soigeneris.com/Documents/Taig_250IPM.3gp .

    Similar Threads:
    Jeff Birt


  2. #2
    Member joeybagadonuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SoCal USA
    Posts
    467
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Question

    Jeff-Birt,

    Are you sure it is running at 300 ipm?

    I don't think that is possible, the stepper would need to be turning 6000 rpm.

    JoeyB

    A doughnut a day keeps the doctor away.


  3. #3
    Registered Hirudin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    1082
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I think he's saying that he tried 300, but it didn't work. 250 was the fastest it would go.

    250 seems extremely fast to me too, but what do I know?



  4. #4
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    It 'will' do 250 IPM but the imbalance of the lead-screw causes a lot of vibration. 100 IPM seems very comfortable. These speeds would not be possible with a larger (270 oz-in) motor as the inductance is too much higher to get the stepper moving that fast (given that you hold all other things constant; driver, power supply, etc.)

    So I will loudly proclaim that "bigger motors != better motors". You MUST size the motor to fit your machine.

    Jeff Birt


  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    118
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff-Birt View Post
    It 'will' do 250 IPM but the imbalance of the lead-screw causes a lot of vibration. 100 IPM seems very comfortable. These speeds would not be possible with a larger (270 oz-in) motor as the inductance is too much higher to get the stepper moving that fast (given that you hold all other things constant; driver, power supply, etc.)

    So I will loudly proclaim that "bigger motors != better motors". You MUST size the motor to fit your machine.
    I'm still new to all this, but from what I can tell, anything greater than 50 IPM just isn't very important to most folks. What I'm interested in, more than achieving ultimate rapids, is the ability to hog out metal at lower speeds without losing steps. That would include cutting various thicknesses of steel plate in circles and arcs, and vigorous Z-axis movements through the metal as well. Unfortunately, there's no standardized test for comparing different motors this way. The hardness of the metal, type of cutter, motor RPM etc. all come into play. Empirical (statistical) data from multiple users seems the only way to really get a handle on this for a newcomer like myself.



  6. #6
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    but from what I can tell, anything greater than 50 IPM just isn't very important to most folks.
    That has been my point all along. Just because my mill will do 100 IPM does not mean that I will run it there; just like my truck will do 100 MPH but I don't drive it at that speed.

    The motors/drive/power supply need to be matched to the machine. All I'm proving with the crazy speed is showing that the 'small' motors are a better choice for a Taig. Acceleration takes torque, so being able to accelerate to crazy speeds shows that the combination I am proposing has more than adequate torque and speed for the true operation range of the machine. A larger motor simply won't perform as well.

    Jeff Birt


  7. #7
    Member ger21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Shelby Township
    Posts
    35538
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Based on Joeys comment, then that means you're spinning the stepper reliably at 5000rpm?

    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    [URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


  8. #8
    Member hoss2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8159
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff-Birt View Post
    That has been my point all along. Just because my mill will do 100 IPM does not mean that I will run it there; just like my truck will do 100 MPH but I don't drive it at that speed.

    The motors/drive/power supply need to be matched to the machine. All I'm proving with the crazy speed is showing that the 'small' motors are a better choice for a Taig. Acceleration takes torque, so being able to accelerate to crazy speeds shows that the combination I am proposing has more than adequate torque and speed for the true operation range of the machine. A larger motor simply won't perform as well.
    All you are proving is that SMOOTHSTEPPER is wicked awesome.
    If the point is that people don't need faster than 50 ipm and you can get that with just the motors at 25kHz,
    why in the world would you spend an extra $155 for something that you never use?
    An extra parallel port card is cheaper.
    People tell you that they get better performance with slightly larger motors (jalessi) but they are dismissed
    because they spent $30 more for speed they don't need in your opinion.
    Sounds a bit more logical than $155.
    Hoss

    Gosh, you've... really got some nice toys here. - Roy Batty -- [URL]http://www.g0704.com[/URL]


  9. #9
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    All the smoothstepper does is generate pulses. If the PC could generate pulses as fast then the LPT would work just as well. You can continue to doubt but I've shown I'm correct with both the theory and by empirical evidence.

    Jeff Birt


  10. #10
    Member hoss2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8159
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    If a car engine could generate it's own nitrous oxide then you wouldn't have to add a bottle either.
    It doesn't happen in the real world.
    Ignore whatever jalessi or anyone else tells you that they do in the real world
    and believe what you want to believe in your world.
    Hopefully the newbies can sift thru the detritus.
    Have a good holiday, Hoss

    Gosh, you've... really got some nice toys here. - Roy Batty -- [URL]http://www.g0704.com[/URL]


  11. #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1237
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Real world empirical evidence would be rapid speeds, material hog, and at the end come back to home 0,0 showing no lost steps. If it can't machine or accelerate without losing steps, what good is speed? If it does do all of the above, then you've made a great point.



  12. #12
    Member jalessi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4553
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Thumbs up

    Hoss2006,

    Dinoflagellate's eat detritus for dinner, some may even believe it is a delicacy.

    Have a most awesome Fourth of July.

    Jeff...

    Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish.


  13. #13
    Gold Member BobWarfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2502
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Makes me wonder if the vibration described was in fact the stepper motor losing steps.

    The smaller motor can do the job, but there's no proof the bigger can't, nor that there aren't some things the bigger motor does better.

    Personally, I like my mill to be able to move over 100 IPM, but then it has quite a bit more travels than the Taig.

    Cheers,

    BW



  14. #14
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Folks the whole point is that the motors, drive, power supply etc needs to fit the machine. On the TAIG larger motors than the range I'm talking about offer no additional benefits. They only cost more and use more power and would most likely harm performance.

    The noise was most definitely the lead screw. It is not supported on both ends so it can whip around. At 100 IPM I did several repeated sweeps across X and indicated at zero and was dead on. The 250 IPM speed is way out on the edge and I am certain that it will loose steps at that speed.

    For larger mills larger motors and faster speeds may be what is called for. That is exactly the point I have been trying to make. Some folks are under the impression that on a TAIG you need to put a 270~370 oz-in motor for the machine to work properly. That is clearly not the case. Then the argument was "well it will be too slow", so I decide to see how fast it will go and when I prove emperically that it is is certainly 'fast enough' the response is 'well that is just the SmoothStepper".

    I hooked a a LPT cable and set Mach to a 60 kHz kernel as that is as fast as my shop PC will go. I could run 90 IPM just as well on the LPT as I could the SmoothStepper.

    I took some new video of the mill doing 90 IPM with the SS and LPT and a better one of the @%) IPM. I'll get them on you tube tonight and add links here.

    Here is a better video of 250 IPM: "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYn9lCgZPEw"]YouTube - 250 IPM SS

    Here is 90 IPM on the SS: "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzrBcXCNDhU"]YouTube - 90 IPM SS

    Here is 90 IPM on the LPT: "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo-9qYWopCE"]YouTube - 90 IPM LPT Machine

    Last edited by Jeff-Birt; 07-03-2009 at 05:46 PM.
    Jeff Birt


  15. #15
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    445
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff-Birt View Post
    The 250 IPM speed is way out on the edge and I am certain that it will loose steps at that speed.
    If even you are certain it will lose steps at this speed, then please don't claim it will "do" that speed. For a speed to have any use, it had better not lose steps otherwise what is the point? No operation, including rapids between feed moves is any good if it loses steps.
    Just because one motor "will" do something, it also does not disprove the fact that another motor can do the same thing.



  16. #16
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I feel like I'm in an episode of 'Who's on first?" I am not claiming that 250 IPM is advisable or reliable or anything of the sort. As I stated in the very first post, I wanted to see how fast it would go. I have to admit being a bit amused at all the flack I'm getting by simply trying to present some factual information about motor sizing. If you are happy with your motor choice than I am happy for you.

    If anyone is interested in learning the facts about motor sizing get yourself a copy of this book: http://www.copperhillmedia.com/ServoSizingBook.html.

    Jeff Birt


  17. #17
    Registered Hirudin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    1082
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    All I can say is I have ~280 oz·in motors (Keling KL23H276-30-8B) and there have been a few times my machine has inexplicably lost steps. I have to guess that less powerful motors would lose steps more often.

    My motors wired in bipolar parallel have a lower inductance than the inductance listed on the spec sheet for those 166 oz·in motors (but I don't know how those motors are suppose to be wired). My rotor inertia is 480 g·cm² compared to the 166 oz·in motors that are 271 g·cm².

    The max speed I can get my Taig to move (reliably, and with my ways and nuts properly adjusted) is around 75 IPM. I limit the machine to around 60 though as I figure that's fast enough.

    I think I'm going to pick up a SmoothStepper. If it doesn't give me anything else it'll let me use USB which I prefer over parallel anyways.

    Last edited by Hirudin; 07-03-2009 at 08:08 PM.


  18. #18
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    118
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hirudin View Post
    All I can say is I have ~280 oz·in motors (Keling KL23H276-30-8B) and there have been a few times my machine has inexplicably lost steps.
    What driver are you using?



  19. #19
    Registered Jeff-Birt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    456
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    All I can say is I have ~280 oz·in motors (Keling KL23H276-30-8B) and there have been a few times my machine has inexplicably lost steps. I have to guess that less powerful motors would lose steps more often.
    Lost steps can be from a variety of reasons:

    1) A running process can interfere with Machs generation of the pulse stream.
    2) Noise in the system from spindle motor, wiring issues etc
    3) Running a machining operation that is right on the edge.
    4) Using backlash comp in Mach.
    5) Improper motor tuning.
    6) Power supply not keeping up / driver issues.

    I would probably suspect noise or PC issues as I think you probably have a good handle on feeds/speeds. With the Taig I recommend using a line filter mounted up by the spindle motor to eliminate it as a problem. Motors are noisy and it will cause problems. I just added some good line filter to my site that work well on the Taig spindle.

    Jeff Birt


  20. #20
    Registered Hirudin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    1082
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noisillator View Post
    What driver are you using?
    Sorry, I have a bad habit of editing my posts 20 times, one of those times I had put the driver, but I must have edited that part out.

    I'm using Gecko G203v drivers with a Keling 48 volt 12.5 (IIRC) amp PSU.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff-Birt View Post
    Lost steps can be from a variety of reasons
    ...
    Yeah, it could have been a few of those things, most likely 3 (which I took to mean: "right on the edge of being too much for the motors to handle). When I was more of a beginner I would try to push the machine too hard. But, the last part I made (which was also used the most operations of any part I've made) didn't have any issues.

    I have my suspicions about noise in my wiring too. If I keep using the AC spindle I'll have to look into getting a filter.



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

Taig mill at 250 IPM!

Taig mill at 250 IPM!